Journal ArticlesFairchild G.T., Marini F., & Snow J.C (2021). Graspability modulates the stronger neural signature of motor preparation for real objects vs. pictures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(12): 2477-2493.
Nguyen L.T., Marini F., Shende S.A., Llano D.A., & Mudar R.A. (2020). Investigating EEG theta and alpha oscillations as measures of value-directed strategic processing in cognitively normal younger and older adults. Behavioural Brain Research, 391: 112702. Petilli M.A., Marini F., & Daini R. (2020). Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control. Cognition, 196: 104129. [link] Lega C., Ferrante O., Marini F., Santandrea E. Cattaneo L., & Chelazzi L. (2019). Probing the neural mechanisms for distractor filtering and their history-contingent modulation by means of TMS. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(38): 7591-7603. [link] Marini F., Lee C., Wagner J., Makeig S., & Gola M. (2019). A comparative evaluation of signal quality between a research-grade and a wireless dry-electrode mobile EEG system. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16(5): 054001. [link] Nguyen L.T., Marini F., Zacharczuk L., Llano D.A., & Mudar R.A. (2019). Theta and alpha band oscillations during value-directed strategic processing. Behavioural Brain Research, 367, 210-214. [link] Marini F., Breeding K.A., & Snow J.C. (2019). Dataset of 24-subject EEG recordings during viewing of real-world objects and planar images of the same items. Data In Brief, 103857. [link] Marini F., Breeding K.A., & Snow, J.C. (2019). Distinct visuo-motor brain dynamics for real-world objects versus planar images. NeuroImage, 195: 232-242. [link] Chelazzi L., Marini F., Pascucci D., & Turatto M. (2019). Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how and where. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29: 135-147. [link] Ravagli, A., Marini, F., Marino, B.F.M., & Ricciardelli, P. (2018). Context modulates congruency effects in selective attention to social cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 940. [pdf] Romano, D., Marini, F., & Maravita, A. (2017). Standard body-space relationships: Fingers hold spatial information. Cognition, 165: 105-112. [pdf] Marini, F., Scott, J., Aron, A.R., & Ester, E.F. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations. Attention, perception & Psychophysics, 79(5): 1384-1392. [pdf] Marini, F., Romano, D., & Maravita, A. (2016). The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect. Experimental Brain Research, 235: 873-887. [pdf] Marini, F. & Marzi, C.A. (2016). Gestalt perceptual organization of visual stimuli captures attention automatically: Electrophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10:446. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10: 446. [pdf] Marini, F., Demeter, E., Roberts, K.C., Chelazzi, L., & Woldorff, M.G. (2016). Orchestrating proactive and reactive mechanisms for the filtering of distracting information: Brain-behavior relationships revealed by a mixed-design fMRI study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(3): 988-1000. [pdf] Marini, F., Van den Berg, B., & Woldorff, M.G. (2015). Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction. Visual Cognition, 23(1-2): 313-335. [pdf] Marini, F., Tagliabue, C.F., Sposito, A.V., Hernandez-Arieta, A., Brugger, P., Estévez, N., & Maravita, A. (2014). Crossmodal representation of a functional robotic hand arises after extensive training in healthy participants. Neuropsychologia, 53: 178-186. [pdf] Marini, F., Chelazzi, L., & Maravita, A. (2013). The costly filtering of potential distraction: evidence for a supramodal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3): 906-922. [pdf] Marini, F., Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M.P. (2011). "Wanted!" The effects of reward on face recognition: electrophysiological correlates. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neurosciences, 11(4): 627-643. [pdf] Arrighi, R., Marini, F., & Burr, D.C. (2009). Meaningful auditory information enhances perception of visual biological motion. Journal of Vision, 9(4): 25. [pdf] |